Hannity: The new year brings new Biden taxes

California Democrats consider wealth tax — including for people who moved out of state

California lawmakers are pushing laws that may impose a brand new tax on the state’s wealthiest residents — even when they’ve already moved to a different half of the nation.

Assemblyman Alex Lee, a progressive Democrat, final week introduced a bill in the California State Legislature that may impose an additional annual 1.5% tax on these with a “worldwide web value” above $1 billion, beginning as early as January 2024.

As early as 2026, the edge for being taxed would drop: these with a worldwide web value exceeding $50 million can be hit with a 1% annual tax on wealth, whereas billionaires would nonetheless be taxed 1.5%.

Worldwide wealth extends past annual revenue to incorporate numerous holdings comparable to farm belongings, arts and different collectibles, and shares and hedge fund curiosity.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom

California Gov. Gavin Newsom
(Justin Sullivan / Getty Images / File)


The laws is a modified model of a wealth tax accepted within the California Assembly in 2020, which the Democrat-led state Senate declined to cross.

The present model simply launched contains measures to permit California to impose wealth taxes on residents even years after they left the state and moved elsewhere.

Exit taxes aren’t new in California. But this invoice additionally contains provisions to create contractual claims tied to the belongings of a rich taxpayer who does not have the money to pay their annual wealth tax invoice as a result of most of their belongings aren’t simply changed into money. This declare would require the taxpayer to make annual filings with California’s Franchise Tax Board and finally pay the wealth taxes owed, even when they’ve moved to a different state.

California was one of several blue states final week to unveil payments to impose new wealth taxes. The different states have been Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New York and Washington. Each state’s proposal contained a distinction tax strategy, however all of them centered across the identical fundamental concept: the wealthy should pay extra.

Lee’s workplace did not reply to a request for remark for this story. However, he is made public statements echoing the message that wealthier residents ought to pay larger taxes.

“The working class has shouldered the tax burden for too lengthy,” Lee wrote in a tweet. “The ultra-rich are paying little to nothing by hoarding their wealth by belongings. Time to finish that.”

According to Lee, the tax would have an effect on 0.1% of California households and generate a further $21.6 billion in state income, which might go to the state common fund. California has among the highest taxes of any state within the nation.

Advocates argue that the cash may increase funding for faculties, housing and different social packages. Perhaps extra importantly, nonetheless, Lee hopes it may assist deal with California’s large $22.5 billion funds deficit.

In this Jan. 24, 2013, photo, a customer looks at a copy of TurboTax on sale at Costco in Mountain View, California.

In this Jan. 24, 2013, picture, a buyer appears to be like at a duplicate of TurboTax on sale at Costco in Mountain View, California.
(AP Photo / Paul Sakuma)


“This is how we are able to hold addressing our budgetary points,” he instructed the Los Angeles Times. “Basically, we may plug the complete gap.”

However, consultants counter that the invoice could have the precise reverse impact by excessive administrative prices and by inflicting an exodus of people to flee the state.

“It brings important administrative challenges with respect to asset and legal responsibility valuation, excessive and distortionary efficient charges, amongst different issues that make it an inefficient income supply,” Gordon Gray, director of fiscal coverage on the American Action Forum, instructed Fox New Digital.

Others echoed this level, additionally arguing a brand new wealth tax would probably lead many rich residents to go away California.

“The proposed California wealth tax can be economically harmful, difficult to manage and would drive many rich residents — and all their present tax funds — out of state,” Jared Walczak, vp of state tasks at Tax Foundation, instructed Fox News Digital. “The invoice units apart as a lot as $660 million per yr simply for administrative prices, greater than $40,000 per potential taxpayer, giving an concept of how troublesome such a tax can be to manage.”

People are already shifting from high-tax states into low-tax ones, in line with a latest analysis by James Doti, president emeritus and economics professor at Chapman University. He discovered that the ten highest tax states misplaced practically 1 in 100 residents in web home migration between July 2021 and July 2022, whereas the ten lowest tax states gained nearly 1 in 100.

California lawmakers pushing the wealth tax suppose they’ll “get round” the issue of residents leaving “by attempting to tax people even after they go away the state,” mentioned Patrick Gleason, vp of state affairs at Americans for Tax Reform. However, he, Gray and Walczak all questioned the legality of such an strategy or labeled it outright unconstitutional.

Some experts argue that a new wealth tax would likely lead many wealthy residents to leave California.

Some consultants argue {that a} new wealth tax would probably lead many rich residents to go away California.
(Ian Jopson / File)


Past research have proven that the highest 1% of taxpayers pay about 50% of state revenue taxes in New York, California and elsewhere, elevating the query of how damaging a mass exodus of rich residents could possibly be to tax income.

Walczak famous {that a} wealth tax can be particularly problematic for California, joking that the people most enthusiastic about such a regulation ought to be people in Texas, the place some high-profile Californians have relocated in recent times.

“A wealth tax could possibly be significantly harmful in California, dwelling to so many tech startups, as a result of the house owners of promising companies could possibly be taxed on a whole lot of hundreds of thousands of {dollars}’ value of estimated enterprise worth that by no means really materializes,” mentioned Walczak. “Very few taxpayers would remit wealth taxes, however many taxpayers would pay the worth. The solely people who ought to genuinely love a California wealth tax are those who work in Texas’ financial growth workplace.”

However, some proponents of wealth taxes argue they’re essential to fight financial inequality.

Maryland Democrat Delegate Jheanelle Ok. Wilkins, for instance, has proposed a invoice in order that households would owe taxes on inheritances over $1 million fairly than $5 million, as is the case at this time. She mentioned such concepts will now acquire extra help after the COVID-19 pandemic uncovered inequality between the wealthy and poor.

“That’s fairly a bit of funds that we’re leaving on the desk,” she instructed the Washington Post.

Other supporters say wealth taxes are small and the wealthy can afford them. But consultants be aware that as a result of the charges are on web value, not on revenue, they’ve an outsized impact.


Walczak illustrated the purpose in a latest weblog post, utilizing for example a $50 million funding, held for 10 years and incomes a ten% nominal annual fee of return in an setting of 3% annual inflation. Without a wealth tax, that funding would yield $46.5 million in funding returns, in present {dollars}, after 10 years. With a 1% wealth tax, nonetheless, it will yield $37.3 million, wiping out practically 20% of the beneficial properties.

Wealth taxes “reduce deeply into funding returns, to the detriment of the broader financial system,” wrote Walczak. “Average taxpayers might not care if the ultra-wealthy have decrease web worths. But they may actually care if innovation slows and investments decline.”